Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition

Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition

The Voice for Open Government in Colorado

  • Home
  • About
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • History
    • Funders
    • Awards
  • News
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Write a Public Records Request Letter
    • DIY FOI
    • Public Data Online
  • Legislature
  • Join
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Sunshine Laws Guide
    Colorado Legislature Colorado Legislature 2017 Public Records Laws

House committee removes some Senate amendments from CORA modernization bill

April 25, 2017

By Jeffrey A. Roberts
CFOIC Executive Director

A bill to modernize Colorado’s public records law survived a state House panel Monday night in a form closer to the way it was introduced earlier in the legislative session.

After a hearing that lasted more than five hours, the House Finance Committee removed a Senate amendment to Senate Bill 17-040 that was intended to make Colorado’s judicial branch subject to the Colorado Open Records Act (CORA).

The committee also undid another Senate amendment that would have allowed records custodians to withhold metadata, a term that is not defined in the bill but generally refers to information about other data. Instead, a new provision requires records requesters to specifically ask for metadata, which wouldn’t be released unless it is disclosable under CORA.

Secretary of State Wayne Williams (left) testifies on SB 17-040. To his left is Rep. Dan Pabon, D-Denver.

“You couldn’t just say, ‘Give me a document and all metadata associated with it,’” said Rep. Dan Pabon, the Denver Democrat sponsoring SB 17-040 in the House. “If you want metadata, you’ve got to specifically request it from a specific record and tell us what kind of metadata you’re requesting.”

By allowing the withholding of metadata, the Senate amendment could have prevented a records requester from obtaining, for instance, a record layout or a data dictionary needed to properly understand the public information kept in a database or spreadsheet.

Metadata also can refer to information embedded in a document. Records custodians asked for some restrictions on the requesting of metadata, worried the bill would force them to examine each bit of metadata in every document ever requested in a searchable format.

The goal of SB 17-040, which passed the Democratic-controlled House Finance Committee on a 7-6 party-line vote, is to clarify the public’s right to obtain digitized government records in useful file formats that make it easier to analyze the information contained in those records.

“This bill is the result of a very long process,” said Secretary of State Wayne Williams, whose office led the stakeholders’ working group (which included the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition) that developed the legislation. “There is likely never a perfect bill that passes through, but this is a vast improvement over the existing law.”

Representatives of several state government departments and the University of Colorado testified against the bill.

Paul Ritzma, legal director for the state Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF), said SB 17-040 would require the department to scrub its vast databases, many of which contain personally identifying information not disclosable under CORA, of all fields of information except those few that must be released. Currently, he said, HCPF simply denies requests for all records from those databases.

Jeremy Hueth, CU’s managing legal counsel, said the bill would put the university’s databases “at risk.” He called SB 17-040 a “paradigm shift” that makes CORA an open-data law rather than an open-records law.

“When you’re talking about trying to impose an entirely new paradigm on the entirety of government with completely different systems,” Hueth said, “I think it’s really important to think through it carefully and what all the implications are to all of us and the way we operate. Because some of us think it would bankrupt us.”

Advancing the bill to the House Appropriations Committee, Democrats on the finance committee removed the judicial department provision over the objections of Republicans, including Rep. Polly Lawrence of Roxborough Park. She has tried unsuccessfully a couple of times to cover the branch’s administrative records under CORA.

The House Finance Committee also nixed another Senate amendment that would have allowed any current or former public employee to ask that his or her home address, personal telephone number or other identifying information be withheld from public records produced in a structured data or searchable format.

County assessors objected to that provision, originally proposed by the Colorado Attorney General’s office, because deleting the property records of current or former public employees would be “a massive undertaking,” Pabon said.

Pabon was successful in adding a “duty to confer” provision that requires records custodians and requesters to talk about large, complicated requests for records in structured-data formats.

Additional amendments to SB 17-040 are likely as the bill continues through the legislative process. Pabon couldn’t propose some of them Monday because House rules prohibit multi-page amendments unless committee members see them at least 24 hours in advance.

“We’re still working on this (bill),” Pabon said. “We’re not going to stop.”

Follow the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition on Twitter @CoFOIC. Like CFOIC’s Facebook page. Do you appreciate the information and resources provided by CFOIC? Please consider making a tax-deductible donation.

Tweet
TOPICS:Colorado Freedom of Information CoalitionColorado judicial branchColorado legislatureColorado Open Records ActColorado public recordsCORAdatabase recordsJeremy HuethmetadataPaul RitzmaRep. Dan PabonRep. Polly LawrenceSB 17-040Secretary of State Wayne Williams

Subscribe to Our Blog

Loading
SHARE TWEET PIN SHARE
  • Previous post
  • Next post

Related Articles

sunshine law

Colorado Legislature 2016, Open Meetings Laws

CFOIC president: Englewood council violated Sunshine Law by deciding to hire city manager behind closed doors


marijuana

Colorado Legislature, Colorado Legislature 2016, First Amendment

Lawmakers OK restrictions on medical pot advertising despite First Amendment concerns


school bus

Public Records Laws

Is the public entitled to know how school bus drivers are disciplined?


Steve Zansberg

Court Records

Judicial committee revives CFOIC’s proposed standard for sealing criminal court records


Recent Posts

  • Judge quashes subpoena seeking testimony of 5280 Magazine editor in breach-of-contract dispute
  • Wrap-up: Veto of CORA bill, passage of NIL and wildlife-damage compensation measures marked 2025 Colorado legislative session
  • Lawmakers drop effort to override veto of CORA bill that would have let governments take more time to process requests — except for those made by journalists
  • Senators kill proposed online clearinghouse for pre-introduced Colorado legislation
  • CFOIC asks private Colorado judge to set aside order that makes an entire case file — and the order itself — off-limits to the public

Archives

Categories

  • Awards
  • Colorado Legislature
  • Colorado Legislature 2014
  • Colorado Legislature 2015
  • Colorado Legislature 2016
  • Colorado Legislature 2017
  • Colorado Legislature 2018
  • Colorado Legislature 2019
  • Colorado Legislature 2020
  • Colorado Legislature 2021
  • Colorado Legislature 2022
  • Colorado Legislature 2023
  • Colorado Legislature 2024
  • Colorado Legislature 2025
  • Court Proceedings
  • Court Records
  • Featured
  • First Amendment
  • Journalism
  • Open Government Resources
  • Open Meetings Laws
  • Other
  • Public Records Laws
  • Uncategorized

PHONE: 720-274-7177
EMAIL: [email protected]

Copyright © 2025 Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition. All rights reserved.