The Durango Herald: The bill passed recently by Colorado legislators to exempt the autopsy reports of minor children from the Colorado Open Records Act is a product of good intentions, but it’s a bad idea that won’t achieve its stated goals.
According to an article in The Durango Herald, the bill’s supporters – including the Colorado Corners Association – argue that releasing autopsy reports “is an invasion of privacy for survivors and could induce copycat teen suicides.” Democratic Rep. Matt Gray, a bill co-sponsor, said young peoples’ autopsy reports don’t “need to be the subject of internet fodder.”
Rep. Gray is right to condemn the cruelty of social media. But I question whether most of the cretins who use the internet as a weapon to terrorize grieving families read autopsy reports in the first place. And I’m fairly sure a lack of facts won’t deter intrusive speculation and vicious gossip.
The concern about copycat suicides seems born of a desperation to “do something” about youth suicides in general. That’s laudable. But it’s telling that no witness who testified for the bill provided a documented example of a copycat death.
I didn’t see one convincing example in 30 years as a medical examiner and coroner. So, I don’t think fear of mainly hypothetical copycat suicides is sufficient grounds for denying public and media access to autopsy reports. I support open records because factual information serves the public better than ill-informed speculation.
There’s another possible reason why coroners and medical examiners might argue for the confidentiality of youth autopsy reports: Most are unlikely to admit it to anybody other than another medical examiner, but we dread having confrontational arguments with the bereaved over the public nature of autopsy findings.
Visit The Durango Herald for more.